Thursday, Jul 12, 2018SearchArchiveChineseChinese
PortugueseHomeOpinionsBusinessMilitaryWorldSocietyCultureTravelScienceSportsSpecial CoveragePhotoVideoEnglishAmerica’s muddled “trade imbalance” shows bias(Peoples Daily Online)    16:09, July 11, 2018The United States has found many reasons for its unilateral trade protectionism. The so called “trade imbalance” theory is one of them.However, it’s often said that those who speak well are no better than those who listen intently. The same can be said for international trade, which is about mutual exchange and willingness. Both sides of a trade agreement will surely discontinue unless there are profits or beneficial domestic results.Therefore, with so many years of trade already passing by, why has America only just become obsessed with a so called trade imbalance? More paradoxically, as one of the strongest global superpowers, how has America seemingly become the biggest victim of such an imbalance? Could it be that the former occupants of the White House were happy to sell their country’s interests, or were too weak to argue with their trade partners?The White House holds two main arguments for why international trade is currently imbalanced. Firstly, the scale of America’s trade deficit with other countries is too large, to such a degree that they have to be dealt with immediately. Secondly, the U.S. suggests that trade partners do not treat the country fairly in terms of policy, which in turn makes U.S. economy, industry and employment all suffer.We should use figures and facts when talking about trade, but unfortunately the American calculator seems to get it wrong when dealing with statistics.Taking Sino-U.S. trade as an example, according to a working group of experts from Chinese and American governments, U.S. statistics regarding the countrys trade deficit with China have been overestimated by 20 percent. More unconvincingly, the trade statistics quoted by the U.S. government only include commodity trade and do not reflect trade in services. However, the U.S. service sector accounts for over 70 percent of its GDP. How has the country lost such a large sum when calculating their trade accounts? It seems that if it were calculated, the so called “trade imbalance theory” would be even more unsustainable.The U.S. is unwilling to discuss commodity and service trade together, but even when it comes to commodity trade itself, the U.S. should take a closer look at how it has arrived at its current situation. When it comes to importing goods, the U.S. buys without hesitation, however when it comes to exporting its own products, the country is not nearly as willing. If this kind of mentality continues then the trade deficit will continue to expand, and there’s no doubt as to why.The percentage of Chinese current account surplus in its GDP has fallen dramatically over the last decade, from 9.9 percent in 2007 to 1.4 percent in 2017. However, it’s telling that China’s trade surplus with America continues to rise.Business is accompanied by figures, and these figures are always changing. Even though certain statistics don’t look good for America, it must be clarified that trade deficit is not equal to interest deficit. The Research Report on China-U.S. Economic and Trade Relations released by the Ministry of Commerce, People’s Republic of China (MOFCOM) shows that in the global value chain, trade surplus is reflected in China, while interest surplus is reflected in America.According to statistics, 57 percent of China’s commodity trade surplus came from foreign companies last year, 59 percent of which came from processing trade. China only earns a small amount in processing fees, while the U.S earns a big profit from design, parts supply and marketing. In the China-U.S. economic and trade cooperation, America also imports a large number of low-cost labor-intensive products from China, which truly benefits American consumers and also helps the U.S. curb domestic inflation.Not actively pursuing a surplus has always been a trade principle of China. To keep up with the growing demands of its people and high-quality development of its economy, China is actively expanding its imports. China voluntarily cut tariffs for daily consumer goods on July 1, involving 1,449 taxable items with an average decrease of 55.9 percent.Muddled accounts are not always calculated by the confused, but are often created by the smart, America’s “trade imbalance” being the perfect example. From advocating “free trade” to “fair trade,” the U.S. has only one purpose, to push through its “America first” agenda, making the whole world pay the bill for its world domination.According to America’s so called “fair trade” assertion, every country is required to keep a complete consistency with America in regards to the tariff of specific products and the market access of all industries, creating absolute equivalence. In the history of international trade, when and among which countries does this absolute equivalence and opening-up exist?Tariff levels and degrees of opening-up are always closely related to a country’s stage of development, endowment of resources and industrial competitiveness. America’s so called fair trade actually denies the different stages of development, which will bring greater impact to the economy and industries of developing countries, which in turn is sure to lead to greater inequality.Unilateral protectionism is like closing yourself in a dark room. Although you have escaped the wind and rain, you have also been isolated from sunshine and air. What is done about international trade can only be negotiated by all countries involved, leading to mutually beneficial and win-win results. var addthis_config = {“data_track_addressbar”:false};(For the latest China news, Please follow Peoples Daily on Twitter and Facebook)(Web editor: Bianji, Hongyu)Add your comment/* * * CONFIGURATION VARIABLES: EDIT BEFORE PASTING INTO YOUR WEBPAGE * * */var;var disqus_shortname=;var disqus_identifier=;if ({disqus_shortname=enpeople;disqus_identifier = 9480023;}/* * * DONT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE * * */(function() {var dsq = document.createElement(script); dsq.type = text/javascript; dsq.async = true;dsq.src = // + disqus_shortname +;(document.getElementsByTagName(head)[0] || document.getElementsByTagName(body)[0]).appendChild(dsq);})();Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.Related readingChina’s small and medium-sized enterprises gear up for trade warChina is ready to meet the costs of the trade warDespite US employment numbers, China has advantages in jobs amid trade rowUS brands set to lose out to European rivals in China amid heightened trade rowU.S. agriculture trade group slams Trump administrations tariffs on ChinaChinese premier says trade war has no winnerUS tariff move violates WTO rules, damages global trade order: FMAPEC business community calls for trade liberalization amid Sino-U.S. trade warU.S. has ignited largest trade war in economic history: Chinas MOCMinistry: No winners in trade warWe Recommend53 World Heritage sites in China
Shenzhen: from small fishing village to metropolis
Pudong spearheads Chinas reform and development
Dragon boat parade greets upcoming Dragon Boat Festival
Highlights of opening ceremony of 2018 FIFA World Cup
In pics: highways in Taklimakan Desert in Chinas Xinjiang
Asias largest dredging vessel completes first sea trial
Pic story: making of Fushan noodle
Date with 20 cultural heritage sitesMost Read1U.S. has ignited largest trade war in economic history: Chi…253 World Heritage sites in China3Xi: Cherish China-Russia ties4“Toilet reform” hot in Beijing5Researchers design new air-defense missile systemTop 10Top 10 most sustainable cities in China
Top 10 European patent applicants in 2016
The power of She in China
Seven most beautiful art museums in China
Popular on Global TimesProperly managing dissidents a challenge for ChinaSwindlers use fake IDs and fabricated stories to fool donors on crowdfunding sitesUbiquitous microplastics have now infiltrated lakes and rivers, Chinese researchers discoverIndian films to cash in as US-China trade tension hits HollywoodHot NewsBeckhams prediction: England joins Brazil in World Cup semis
Op-Ed: US show of force shows who is really militarizing the South China Sea
Essay topics of China’s university entrance exams: Would you pass the test?
Unmanned ‘shark swarm’ to be used in sea battles, military patrols
Miss America eliminates swimsuits and wont judge on looks
US sending warship through Taiwan Straits may provoke Chinese mainland response
Key WordsXi JinpingBelt and RoadG20South China SeaAIIBLinks:Beijing TodayCRI EnglishSINA EnglishGlobal Show ChinaChina Human RightsChina XinjiangTibet OnlineCCTV Beijing Review GMW.cnChina Economic Net
China Tibet Online
Qiushi JournalWomen of China
Consulate General in New York.link_content{overflow:hidden;}
About Peoples Daily Online |Join Us | Contact Us © Peoples Daily OnlineBingCW.Init({AppID:””,ContentArea:”p_content,p_title”,MachineTranslation:true,WebDefinition:true


邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注

13 + 6 =

No Related Post